Monday, March 4, 2019
Capital Punishment Annotated Bib
Chinwhitethorna Sharma Field LNG 406 25 January 2011 great(p) Punishment nevertheless An Annotated Bibliography Capote, Truman. In Cold Blood A True Account of A Multiple Murder and Its Consequences. New York Vintage, 1994. Print. Crowe, Robert E. Should Capital Punishment be kept up(p)? Pro. Congressional Digest Aug. 1927 228+. Academic chase Complete. EBSCO. Web. 26 Jan. 2011. Crowe believes the primary value of cap penalty is its usefulness in deterring whatever future malefactor acts, particularly murders. He asserts the demise penalty is the notwithstanding penalization able in value to the murders or other crimes for which cap penalty is sentenced. plot of land attacking the United States presidency for its lack of criminal regulation, Crowe suggests hood punishment go forth instill fear in criminals and make them think doubly before committing a violent crime. He differentiates this fear of punishment is what protects citizens from the ira of brutal mur derers who, without the cobblers last penalty, would believe they have nothing to fear. Crowe proclaims several(prenominal) whiz who tries to evacuate the termination penalty in court is hampering the progress of the American government and is keeping the alight of beau monde in danger.As the denomination continues, Crowe concurs that the sense of touch of being on the jury of a murder trial is unmatchable of the near difficult as you hold the spiritedness of a psyche in your hands. However, he believes tribe have the best interest of their confederacy in mind. Crowe uses Chicago as an example of how gravid punishment as resulted in the decrease in murders and other crimes. Throughout the rest of the obligate, Crowe discusses how the disembodied spirit of the victim is forever lost and the punishment should be proportionate to the rime, how regular(a) those who are deemed irresponsible should be sentenced to the death penalty for the better of society, and how thit her is proof of hood punishment deterring further crime. Crowes analysis of seat of government punishment and its verticalification is thorough, but only thorough in one aspect. The cause focuses only on the deterring effect the death penalty has on crime and other murderers. His development is reasonable, but seems to be more focussed on appealing to the emotions rather than stating blatant facts. The source of this denomination is a congressional magazine.Therefore, staying within the limits of the slight prepossession, the development is coming from a credible source and should be valuable for my research and vie.. Due to the member dating back to the 1920s, the statistics and facts of this article may not be accurate. While hardly a(prenominal) of my other research has foc utilize on addressing counter-arguments, this article cheeringifies one lovesome point. Crowes argument revolves around the deterring effect of detonating device punishment on murders. Therefo re, this article ordain succeed a basis for my analysis of the social results of the death penalty.I will withal use the statements do by Crowe just about how it is the moral duty of the justice system to protect and provide for the citizens for the country. By leaving these murders and criminals alive, he believes we are shake offting the rest of society at risk. This article will prove to be invaluable when addressing some of the issues such as societal safety and the overall effects of heavy(p) punishment on future criminal acts. Franklin, H. Bruce. Billy Budd and Capital Punishment. American Literature. Web. 02 Feb. 2011. . History Early World and American demise punishment Laws. Death Penalty. Web. 02 Feb. 2011. . Johnson, Robert, and Sandra Smith. Life Without Parole, Americas Other Death Penalty. The Prison Journal. acute Publications. Web. 30 Jan. 2011. . Life without war cry is examined as a form of death penalty. The authors declare how life without parole is a true life punishment because the prisoners must live their lives conditioned that they will never be allowed out. The ii interview many of the prisoners and prison officers to understand the conditions, both(prenominal) mentally and physically, of the prisons in which these criminals stay.Smith and Johnson indicate the conditions of the prisons are ideal because they include food, a bed, sport and many other commodities. The true impact comes from the emotional turmoil from knowing that the prison is where they will die. While many assume the life without parole prisoners must be a threat to society within and exterior of the prison, the authors prove the emotional impact changes the criminals and makes them more respectable people The article also shows how these people feel so lonely and that is why life without parole is a viable alternative for the death penalty.Overall, this source will probably be the least used source out of my constitutional bibliography. I chose th is source when I knew that my part of the argument would be about the conditions of prisons. However, the article does satisfy the part of my argument that shows how the prisons of these criminals are actually in perfect condition and how the prisoners enjoy the conditions while living there. Robert Johnson and Sandra Smith both work at large universties and are publishing a epoch-making article. Therefore, I believe this article is reliable and the information should be credible.The last of the source is to show how life without parole is not as correct as everyone believes it is. The source is objective because it shows both good and bad aspects of prison. I will use this source to help prove my point about the condition of the prisons. Johnson and Smith both indicate how the conditions are fantastic with food and recreation. These conditions are better than many of the conditions of people living in America. I will also utilize the first-hand account of one of the prisoners to back up my argument.It will fit perfectly into the body of my argument by plastic how I explain how tax-payers money is furnishing a lavish living port of these criminals compared to what they were in before. Hopefully, this turn up will help convince people that the baby bird cost difference that may occur at times among life without parole and detonating device punishment is miniscule when considering the broader aspect. lemony, Dudley. Death Penalty Paper. Pro-death Penalty. Web. 30 Jan. 2011. . Sharps article assesses every aspect of the capital punishment argument.He starts by indicating how the anti-death penalty movement has overwhelmed the debate and has make full peoples minds with lies which have no substantial evidence. He states how capital punishment is the only punishment which fits the amplitude of the crime. When addressing the risk of a frank man being executed, he explains how the statistics given by intimately people are incorrect. In the United States, there have only been a minute amount of cases where an unreserved man was executed. Sharp illustrates the lack of mistakes involving the death penalty.Sharp continues to summarize how the death penalty is a deterrent to crime and how this fact is conclusive and irrefutable. He also states how capital punishment makes American society a safer place to live. Throughout the rest of the article, Sharp talks about a variety of topics including race and the death penalty, cost of capital punishment versus life without parole, death penalty procedures and the relation between Christianity and capital punishment. Sharps analysis of every argument makes this article absolutely perfect for the debate supporting capital punishment.For every point he makes, he provides a resource and occasionally a justification if numbers should be altered. Since this put is primarily about supporting capital punishment, a small bias maybe evident in his writing. He seems to be a credible source because he works as the Death Penalty Resources conductor at Justice For All. I think his article could be used for a variety of purposes because he encompasses all of the major points supporting capital punishment. He frequently takes information from the Death Penalty Information Center, reinforcing his credibility.I think this article will be valuable to be because of the statistics and information it uses to show how capital punishment is actually cheaper then life without parole. inappropriate most of the other sites I have looked at, it actually provides calculations step by step and justification if certain numbers are only estimates and how these estimates were made. Sharp does not leave any part of the argument with a lame end. Since my argument is the cost between death penalty and life without parole, this article will almost suffice as all I need.I believe it will be very difficult to refute evidence which is so precise such as the information Sharp has provided. This article wi ll help show that the death penalty is cheaper than life without parole. Stanton, Edward C. Should Capital Punishment be Retained? Pro. Congressional Digest Aug. 1927 232+. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 25 Jan. 2011. Stantons article assesses each specific argument made by people supporting the abolishment of capital punishment and provides a logical and complete rebuttal.After reviewing past articles and statements made by these abolitionists, Stanton states that most of these people are sentimentalists who have completely battered the minds of readers into a state of submission. Through the use of two court cases in the past few years in which murderers were given a lighter sentence than they deserved, the author reiterates sentimentalists brainwash and destroy the backbone of juries. Furthermore, Stanton provides statistics demonstrating the increase of homicides in the United States.Stanton declares most of the sentimentalists lack experience dealing directly with murde rs which makes their statements difficult to believe. Throughout the rest of the article, the author indicates several of the arguments these sentimentalists put forth and counters with his own support of capital punishment. Stanton includes counter-arguments against all of the following choosing life-imprisonment over capital punishment, giving opportunities to the criminals, capital punishment being a practice of the past, and the chance of having an innocent person convicted and executed.Stanton provides a substantial and thorough analysis of why capital punishment should be maintained as a policy in the United States. His information seems credible as he uses several statistics and court cases to reinforce his statements. Stanton may be slightly biased because he has dealt with murders in the past, but this also contributes to his authenticity. The information is quite reliable as it comes from a congressional magazine. This article primarily focuses on telling the complete trut h about capital punishment and convincing people capital punishment is a just form of punishment.Stanton tries to eliminate the flowery and false information sentimentalists provide for readers. The only negative aspect of this article is it dates back to the 1920s. Therefore, the statistics cannot be used for present-day. Stantons article on capital punishment satisfies one of the requirements for my debate. He provides an outcome for many of the points the other team may use. The article shapes how I will write my rebuttal by providing information which would counter most of the arguments put forth by those arguing capital punishment as an inequitable form of punishment.Stanton solidifies my view that capital punishment deters criminals from committing the worst crimes because they fear the death penalty. He also addresses the fear of executing people are innocent of a crime. Since the chance of a false conviction is so small, any doubt that the death penalty is a proper form of punishment for those criminals with unforgiveable crimes should be forgotten. Stantons views coincide with my own and provide a solid base for a rebuttal in the debate.